top of page

Shadow Infrastructures: AI’s Forgotten Foundations

making; future artefact; signals and trends analysis; worldbuilding

Project Duration

2 months

pngkey_edited.png
IMG_8286.jpeg
IMG_8297.jpeg
IMG_8302.jpeg

“Like a nation constructed around highways prematurely foreclosed on a future not defined by petroleum, the entrenching and carbon-cancelling of the data center forecloses on the possibility of questioning whether so much of this computational future is even necessary.”

-Ingrid Burrington, Machine Landscapes [1]

 Research Questions and Literature Review

Trends, Drivers, and Signals Analysis 

Speculative and Provocative Design 

Material Exploration and Making

This project explores the material legacy of artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure in 2100, particularly the data centers that once powered it but now remain as decaying remnants of a technological era.

What are the material and environmental legacies of AI infrastructure?

​

​How do abandoned data centers become sites of speculation and historical interpretation?

​

​Who bears responsibility for the waste AI infrastructures generate—users, corporations, or governments?

​

​How can speculative design and archaeology help us critique and rethink digital infrastructure?

The shadow the project is addressing is the short-term thinking embedded in AI infrastructure development. Capitalism often prioritizes immediate financial returns, growth, and quarterly results over long-term sustainability or social responsibility. This emphasis on quick gains can encourage decision-making that overlooks long-term consequences, such as environmental degradation, labor exploitation, or the depletion of resources.

 

The lack of transparency around the energy consumption, labor exploitation, and material waste of AI systems highlights this shadow. The project focuses on e-waste (circuit boards, plastic components) and the immaterial waste of energy consumption. This choice emphasizes the fossilization of digital interactions and the energy-intensive processes required to support them.

​​A’s growing energy demand, particularly through data centers, has significant environmental consequences. These data centers require substantial energy to store and process the vast amounts of data AI systems generate. 

 

To meet the demand and become pioneers in the industry, organizations and governments worldwide are investing in massive digital infrastructures to sustain AI growth. This project challenges the short-sightedness of such decisions, offering a cautionary example of the need to design for alternative models of AI distribution. The aim is to foster long-term thinking and reflection on how today’s choices will affect future generations.

 

Data centers are often built discreetly, rendering them invisible to the public eye. This invisibility contributes to a lack of awareness and accountability regarding their environmental impact. While e-waste is often discussed in terms of physical degradation, the hidden costs of AI—such as energy consumption, water usage, and labor exploitation—remain largely unexamined in mainstream discourse. Research on digital waste, AI energy consumption, and e-waste provides valuable context for understanding AI’s environmental footprint.

 

The data centers that house these systems are energy-intensive, requiring constant cooling and maintenance, leading to high carbon emissions and resource depletion. Yet, these consequences remain invisible to users, creating a “shadow” of hidden waste that is externalized, ignored, or forgotten. 

​

This project questions whether our reliance on massive AI infrastructure is inevitable, or if alternative futures remain possible. The project builds on research into AI’s physical dependencies, including energy grids, water systems, and rare earth minerals; case studies of data center failures, such as facilities shutting down due to extreme heat waves; and speculative design projects that examine the material consequences of digital technology.

Image by Taylor Vick

AI's Energy Surge & Climate Impact​​

The development of AI has massively increased the demand of energy.As AI continues to expand, data center power demand is expected to increase by 160%. [2] In 2024, Google failed to meet key net-zero goals, partly due to increased energy consumption from AI projects, leading to a 48% rise in greenhouse gas emissions. [3][4] 

Image by Igor Omilaev

The Shift to Edge AI

The shift from AI model training to inferencing will reduce the long-term demand for large centralized AI factories. [5] The evolution of on-device AI, driven by privacy and security concerns, marks a significant shift from cloud-based processing to local, device-based computation. This transition is enabled by advancements in chip technology, such as Apple's M4 and Nvidia's RTX GPUs. [6] Lenovo has also introduced the ThinkEdge SE100, a compact, liquid-cooled AI inferencing server designed for edge computing. Unlike traditional AI systems that rely on large, power-hungry data centers, edge computing processes data closer to the source, reducing latency and cloud dependence. This approach enhances real-time AI applications while lowering cooling demands and infrastructure costs.[7]

Image by Logan Voss

Centralized AI vs Decentralized Alternatives â€‹

The recent surge in centralized AI infrastructure investments, such as Musk’s xAI data centers, reflects a strategic focus on large-scale, centralized data centers.[8] This approach often sidelines alternative, decentralized models like edge computing, which could offer more sustainable and efficient solutions by processing data closer to its source. Additionally, regulatory frameworks like the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act impose stringent requirements on AI applications, potentially creating compliance challenges for open-source and decentralized AI initiatives. [9]. These developments signal a preference among governments and tech giants for centralized AI infrastructures, potentially hindering the exploration and adoption of alternative models.

Urban Building

AI Overcapacity Crisis

China's rapid AI expansion has led to excess data center capacity due to overestimated demand and a lack of expertise in handling complex AI processes. While the country aims to establish 50 intelligent computing centers by 2025, many existing facilities remain underutilized or idle. AI data centers consume four times the energy of traditional ones, making them costly to operate. Poorly designed AI data centers fail to integrate compute, storage, and networking efficiently, leading to inefficiencies. This issue reflects a broader trend in China's top-down economic planning, where government-backed industries often face overcapacity and low utilization. [10]

Image by Rapha Wilde

Extreme Heat & Data Center Failures

In 2022, record temperatures in the UK led to cooling system failures at Google and Oracle data centers in London, causing outages. As extreme heat events become more frequent due to climate change, data centers face rising cooling demands, increasing electricity consumption and carbon emissions. [11] 

image_fx_ (2).jpg

2025

image_fx_.jpg

2100

Images by ImageFX

Scenario

We never learn. We always build massive infrastructures without considering alternative futures. It happened with highways in the petroleum age, and again with data centers in the AI age.

In the 2020s, the AI boom led to an explosion of data center construction. Governments and corporations rushed to expand computational capacity, prioritizing scale over sustainability. Localized and edge computing existed, but policymakers were blind to alternative models. Centralized infrastructure was seen as the only way forward.

The signals were there. Heatwaves had already forced data centers offline. In the summer of 2024, a facility in the UK had to shut down when its cooling systems failed under extreme temperatures. Climate experts warned that these energy-hungry infrastructures weren’t built for a warming world. Advocates pushed for localized AI, energy-efficient edge computing, and smaller-scale infrastructure. But governments saw centralized AI as key to data sovereignty, while tech giants resisted decentralization to maintain control over computational economies. They couldn’t imagine an AI future without massive structures.

By the 2050s, as energy grids strained and cooling systems failed en masse, these structures were slowly decommissioned. Now, in 2100, these once-powerful data centers lie abandoned—monuments to an era of reckless digital expansion. Their structures are crumbling, their servers silent. Archaeologists and historians explore their ruins, unearthing the remnants of a society that believed in infinite computation.

IMG_8303.jpeg

Material Exploration & Design Process

IMG_7813.jpeg
6FDDF2C5-E8CD-4D8C-B62F-E5E2C9E4DA35.jpeg
IMG_8226.jpeg
2F92C222-D526-48F2-9C2D-8ED003A955CA.jpeg
IMG_8304.jpeg

A fragment of decayed e-waste retrieved from an abandoned data center. Once a key component of an AI-driven world, it is now an unrecognizable fossil- its circuits rusted, its memory erased.

IMG_8297.jpeg

As we continue to accelerate the pace of innovation, we leave behind more than just physical waste; we leave the traces of a culture that prioritizes growth at any cost, often at the expense of the environment and future generations. These “fossils” of AI and digital systems will, in time, become the archaeological artifacts of a bygone era, offering future societies a window into the choices we made and the priorities we held.

Bibliography

​

  1. Young, L. (2019) Machine Landscapes: Architectures of the Post Anthropocene. John Wiley & Sons.

  2. AI is poised to drive 160% increase in data center power demand (no date). Available at: https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/AI-poised-to-drive-160-increase-in-power-demand 

  3. Google falling short of important climate target, cites electricity needs of AI - ABC News (no date). Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20240702214943/https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/google-falling-short-important-climate-target-cites-electricity-111614506 

  4. Google blames AI as its emissions grow instead of heading to net zero | Climate Crisis News | Al Jazeera (no date). Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20240703005703/https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2024/7/2/google-blames-ai-as-its-emissions-grow-instead-of-heading-to-net-zero 

  5. Goovaerts, D. (2024) What happens to AI factories when AI moves to the edge? Available at: https://www.fierce-network.com/cloud/what-happens-ai-factories-when-ai-moves-edge 

  6. Beyond the Cloud: Pioneering Local AI on Mobile Devices with Apple, Nvidia, and Samsung (no date). Available at: https://www.netguru.com/blog/beyond-the-cloud-pioneering-local-ai-on-mobile-devices-with-apple-nvidia-and-samsung 

  7. Lenovo introduces entry-level, liquid cooled AI edge server (no date) Network World. Available at: https://www.networkworld.com/article/3841518/lenovo-introduces-entry-level-liquid-cooled-ai-edge-server.html 

  8. say, S.M.H. your (2025) Musk’s xAI considering second data center, $5bn Dell server deal. Available at: https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/musks-xai-considering-second-data-center-5bn-dell-chip-deal/ 

  9. Uram, L. (no date) The EU AI Act: A Double-Edged Sword For Europe’s AI Innovation Future, Forbes. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbestechcouncil/2025/01/23/the-eu-ai-act-a-double-edged-sword-for-europes-ai-innovation-future/ 

  10. China’s hectic AI rollout has left data centers idling (no date). Available at: https://www.lightreading.com/ai-machine-learning/china-s-hectic-ai-rollout-has-left-data-centers-idling 

  11. Heatwave forced Google and Oracle to shut down computers - BBC News (no date). Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-62202125 

bottom of page